The American Revolution was a defining moment in history, sparked by the tyranny of King George III. His oppressive taxation and economic control over the colonies led to widespread resentment and ultimately rebellion. Today, central banking serves a similar function, exerting unchecked financial dominance over nations and individuals. Just as King George imposed excessive taxes without colonial representation, central banks devalue currency through inflation—an invisible tax that silently erodes people’s purchasing power. While King George’s economic policies directly fueled discontent and drove the colonies toward independence, central banks operate through more insidious mechanisms, manipulating interest rates, controlling credit, and ensuring that the financial elite benefit at the expense of the working class.

Instead of relying on overt taxation like the British monarchy, central banking achieves financial subjugation through money printing, fractional reserve lending, and fiat currency manipulation. This system enables governments to finance endless wars and reckless spending programs without the need for direct taxpayer approval. Just as King George sought to maintain control over the colonies by restricting their economic freedoms, central banks today dictate the flow of money, limit individual financial sovereignty, and prop up unsustainable government debt. The key difference is that while King George’s oppression was visible through tariffs, taxes, and trade restrictions, central banking operates in the shadows, stealing wealth through inflation and economic distortions while the public remains largely unaware of its true impact.

The Parallels Between King George and Central Banking

Taxation Without Representation

The concept of “taxation without representation” was a central grievance that fueled the American Revolution. Colonists rebelled against being taxed by the British government without having a voice in Parliament, recognizing that such taxes were a form of financial subjugation. But what is often overlooked is that King George didn’t just rely on direct taxes to fund his imperial ambitions; he also inflated the British Crown’s currency as a means of extracting wealth from the colonies. Through the debasement of the currency, King George effectively imposed an inflationary tax, which operated much like a hidden tax. Today’s central banking system enacts a similar form of financial enslavement through inflation, a hidden tax that people have no control over. Central banks increase the money supply through practices like money printing and fractional reserve lending, causing the value of money to decline over time. While wages may increase nominally, the real purchasing power of those wages decreases, forcing people to work harder just to maintain their standard of living. This silent theft benefits the financial elites who control the monetary system, while the average citizen bears the burden.

Inflation works in the background, eroding wealth without direct visibility. The process is subtle but devastating—when money is printed, it initially benefits those closest to the source of new currency, such as banks, large corporations, and government contractors. As the newly minted money circulates, its value diminishes, harming those who receive it last: the working class, retirees, and savers. Inflation creates a redistribution of wealth, benefiting the rich who can protect their assets while the average person’s savings lose value. This silent extraction of wealth is a more insidious form of taxation, as it operates without public consent and often goes unnoticed by the majority. Just as King George used both direct taxes and inflationary currency debasement to fund his government, today’s central banks use both visible and invisible forms of financial oppression, shifting the burden of financial irresponsibility onto ordinary citizens.

This hidden mechanism of central banking—manipulating the money supply without direct approval—mirrors the colonial grievances against King George III, who imposed taxes without consent and also debased the currency to extract wealth. The modern version of financial tyranny is less visible but just as oppressive. Governments can finance wars, social programs, and deficit spending through the creation of money, avoiding the need for direct taxation. Central banks have the power to print money, pushing inflation onto the public, which shifts the burden of financial irresponsibility onto ordinary citizens. Unlike the overt taxes of the past, which directly impacted the colonists, inflation quietly devalues the money in people’s pockets and savings, causing them to lose wealth without ever voting on or even fully understanding the cause. The result is the same: the wealthy and powerful benefit while the average person bears the cost.

The parallels between the colonial resistance to British taxation and today’s resistance to central banking are undeniable. Just as the colonists fought for economic independence from King George, today’s financial independence movements—advocating for sound money like gold, or silver—seek to free people from the grip of central banks. King George’s policies were visible and directly oppressive, but his use of both direct taxes and currency debasement mirrors the covert tactics of modern central banks. The challenge today is to break free from this invisible financial tyranny, reclaim control over the money supply, and ensure that future generations aren’t burdened by the same cycles of wealth extraction and economic distortion. Only by embracing sound money and rejecting the current fiat system can individuals truly achieve financial sovereignty, just as the colonists sought to do.

Control Over Currency

During colonial times, King George III imposed strict limitations on the American colonies’ ability to issue their own stable currency. Instead, the colonies were forced to rely on the British monetary system, which primarily served the interests of the Crown. This policy ensured that the colonies remained economically dependent on Britain, leaving them vulnerable to the Crown’s financial decisions. The colonies had no control over their own monetary policy, and this economic stranglehold stifled their ability to grow independently. By restricting the issuance of currency, King George maintained control over the colonial economy, using it as a tool to extract wealth and resources for the benefit of the British Empire, all while denying the colonies the autonomy to manage their own economic future.

In much the same way, modern central banks monopolize the creation of money, exerting control over a nation’s economy through the issuance of currency. Central banks, like the Federal Reserve in the United States, have the power to set interest rates and dictate financial conditions that influence everything from inflation to credit availability. The currency that they issue—fiat money—has no tangible backing such as gold or silver. This detachment from real value enables central banks to manipulate the economy, inflating or deflating the money supply at will. By creating money out of nothing, central banks are able to fund government spending, military ventures, and corporate bailouts, all without directly taxing the people.

The ability for individuals and businesses to choose their own currency—whether it be gold or silver—would significantly undermine the power of central banks. If the public had the freedom to use a currency of their choosing, the financial control held by central banks would be broken. In a competitive monetary system, the value of money would be determined by the market, not by a centralized authority that can print and manipulate money at will. This shift toward a decentralized currency system would likely lead to a more stable and prosperous economy, where inflation would be more closely tied to tangible assets, and economic booms and busts would be less artificially induced. The freedom to choose currency would empower individuals to protect their wealth, create a more transparent financial system, and ultimately reduce the systemic risks created by central banking practices.

Suppression of Economic Freedom

In the years leading up to the American Revolution, the colonies were subjected to a series of restrictive trade policies, high tariffs, and monopolies that were designed to serve the economic interests of the British Crown. The British government prioritized its own prosperity over the well-being of the colonies, imposing laws that limited the colonies’ ability to freely trade, produce, and innovate. The mercantilist system that underpinned these policies was designed to keep the colonies economically dependent on Britain, ensuring that wealth and resources flowed back to the British Empire rather than fostering independence. The colonies were effectively denied the freedom to build their own economic systems, leaving them vulnerable to the will of the Crown and its financial interests.

This economic suppression from the British Empire closely mirrors the way central banking distorts free markets today. Central banks, through practices like artificially low interest rates and frequent bailouts, favor large financial institutions and corporations that are aligned with government interests. By manipulating interest rates and controlling the flow of money, central banks effectively distort the natural functioning of the market, artificially propping up failing industries while stifling smaller competitors. Small businesses and individual entrepreneurs, who do not have the same access to cheap credit or bailouts, are left at a disadvantage in an economy tilted toward the interests of the largest players. Just as the British Crown’s policies hindered the colonies’ economic growth and independence, central banking practices today prevent true competition and concentrate wealth and power in the hands of the few.

The economic policies that both the British Crown and modern central banks impose ultimately prevent individuals from engaging in voluntary exchanges free from manipulation or interference. True economic freedom is about the ability to choose what goods or services to produce, buy, and sell, without being subject to the whims of a centralized authority that controls currency and credit. In an ideal system, individuals and businesses would operate in an open market where prices are set by supply and demand, and entrepreneurs can compete on a level playing field. Without the distortions created by central banks, businesses would thrive based on their ability to provide value, not on their political connections or access to cheap credit. Only when the influence of central banks is removed can individuals experience true financial independence and participate in an economy where success is determined by the free exchange of goods and services, not by regulatory advantages and market manipulation.

Financing of War and Empire

Historically, King George III financed British imperial conquests through taxation, directly burdening his subjects with the financial cost of war. This created an immediate and tangible pressure on the population, as taxes rose to support military campaigns, often leading to economic hardship and resentment among the colonists. The cost of war was felt directly by the people, forcing them to bear the financial weight of the empire’s ambitions. The taxation system, though oppressive, at least made the population aware of the economic costs associated with war. This level of transparency created a clear connection between government actions and their economic impact, which ultimately contributed to the colonists’ desire for independence.

In contrast, modern central banking systems enable governments to wage wars without the need for immediate, direct taxation. Through mechanisms like money printing and inflationary financing, central banks provide virtually unlimited funds to governments, allowing them to engage in military conflicts without the same kind of financial constraints that earlier generations faced. When governments need money to fund wars, they can simply create it, which leads to an expansion of the money supply and the devaluation of the currency. This process effectively hides the true cost of war from the public. While the financial burden is shifted away from direct taxation, the long-term effects are felt through inflation, which erodes the purchasing power of citizens’ savings and wages. The real cost of war is transferred onto the general population, who often remain unaware of the ways in which their wealth is being silently siphoned off.

Without the power to create money out of thin air, governments would be forced to seek more transparent methods of financing wars, such as through direct taxation or by borrowing from the public. This would not only make military conflicts more costly but also force governments to justify their actions to the public, who would likely demand clear and rational reasons for such expenditures. The need for direct funding would create a natural check on the frequency and scale of wars, as the people would be less inclined to support endless conflicts if they understood the direct financial consequences. In this scenario, large-scale wars would become less feasible, as governments would have to demonstrate their need for resources and publicly debate the moral and financial implications of military intervention. This would help to reduce the frequency of wars and ensure that conflicts are only pursued when absolutely necessary, thus minimizing the financial and human costs associated with warfare.

Public Resistance and the Call for Sound Money

The American Revolution was fundamentally a rejection of centralized control, not just in terms of political governance, but also economic sovereignty. The Founding Fathers saw firsthand the dangers of a government that controlled both the political and economic systems. The British Crown’s monopoly on currency and its ability to inflate or deflate the value of money at will was one of the many forms of oppression the colonists endured. The British government’s manipulation of money and credit essentially robbed the American colonists of their financial freedom, forcing them to rely on a currency that was inflated and controlled from across the ocean. In response, the Founding Fathers sought to enshrine gold and silver as the official currency of the new United States, recognizing that sound money—backed by tangible assets—was key to maintaining individual liberty and preventing the government from gaining unchecked control over people’s wealth and financial resources. This understanding of the connection between money and freedom was central to the creation of the American Republic.

In the modern era, the battle for financial freedom continues through movements advocating for sound money like gold and silver. Just as the colonists fought against the British government’s control over their economic systems, today’s resistance movements seek to break free from the modern-day equivalent of central banking’s financial tyranny. Central banks, through their control over fiat money, interest rates, and credit markets, exert significant power over economies and individuals, often in ways that benefit the political and financial elites at the expense of the broader population. By endorsing sound money, these movements aim to reclaim economic sovereignty, creating a financial system that is beyond the reach of central banks’ manipulation. This allows individuals to preserve their wealth without the constant threat of inflation or government policies that erode the value of their money.

These movements are not merely about financial independence—they represent a larger philosophical shift toward a system where individuals control their own economic destiny. Centralized financial systems, epitomized by fiat currencies and central banking, inherently carry the risk of manipulation and corruption. By adopting decentralized alternatives, people can protect themselves from the volatility and unfairness of a system where wealth is often redistributed to the elite through inflation, bailouts, and the expansion of credit. Sound money, whether in the form of gold or silver, provides a bulwark against this manipulation. It ensures that financial decisions are made based on the principles of transparency, fairness, and stability, rather than the whims of central banks and government officials. Just as the Founding Fathers sought to ensure the economic independence of the new nation, modern resistance movements aim to create a future where individuals can freely transact, save, and invest in a financial system that serves everyone equally.

Rethinking Financial Independence in the Age of Central Banking

The parallels between King George’s tyranny and today’s central banking system are clear. Just as the American colonies fought for their economic freedom from British rule, we are now confronted with a modern form of financial control—one that is far more subtle but equally destructive. Central banks have quietly gained power over our financial systems, eroding wealth through inflation and the unchecked creation of fiat currency. This hidden form of taxation, where money loses its value over time, is a silent yet pervasive force that undermines the financial stability of everyday citizens.

To break free from this cycle, we must return to the principles of sound money, rooted in tangible assets like gold and silver. These systems offer a shield against the hidden costs imposed by central banks and provide a more stable, equitable foundation for future generations. By addressing the imbalances within the current system, we can restore control over our financial future and create a more resilient economy, one that is not at the mercy of centralized powers that erode our wealth and our autonomy.

In this struggle, the sword we wield is truth. The power of truth lies in its ability to expose the hidden forces that shape our financial systems and the way they govern our lives. Just as the colonists of the American Revolution understood the importance of revealing the injustices of British rule, we too must understand the impact of central banking on our economic freedoms. By speaking the truth about inflation, fiat currency, and the consequences of unchecked monetary policies, we can awaken awareness and ignite the change needed to challenge these systems of control. Truth is our most potent weapon, for when we confront the reality of the situation, we empower ourselves to reclaim the future we deserve.